Monthly Archive for March, 2004

ARIA conceals information about ‘record-breaking sales’

I saw an article in the Sydney Morning Herald today, about the ARIAs attempt to hide the fact that last year was a record-breaking year in terms of CD sales. There's also an article at Ars Technica here.

For years the ARIA has claimed that internet music piracy has led to a decrease in CD sales. These figures clearly show that despite widespread music piracy over many P2P networks, CD sales have increased. Instead of lauding the record number of CDs sold, the ARIA press release is titled "Music DVD continues its rise whilst CD singles slide further". It goes on to say that there was a 16.5% decrease in single sales last year. The author of the article, Steve Cannane, sums it up well: "But it's not telling the whole truth. It neglects to mention the record companies are not releasing as many singles as they used to. Sales of singles do not make much money. Singles are these days pretty much released for promotional purposes - to get radio play and drum up interest in an album. In the US, singles have virtually disappeared from sale." Of course, without knowing this fact, readers of the press release will jump to the conclusion that internet piracy is the reason for this drop in single sales. That may be the case, to a small degree. But the fact that there was a large increase in CD sales indicates otherwise.

Maybe, just maybe, all this internet piracy has actually had a positive effect on CD sales, because people have greater access to music. All someone has to do is type in the artist, song name, album, etc, and they will get a list of results. If I were to search for an artist in any major P2P app, I would get a listing of songs available. I might download one of those, and then another, and find out that I like a lot of the songs by this band. I might then go and buy the CD, and another, and another, because I find that I really, really like this band. I'd then go an tell my friends to buy this artist's CDs, and so on and so on. Now, I'm not saying music piracy on the internet is a good thing - far from it. It's copyright infringement and we all know it. BUT, the internet (and by extension, the P2P apps that many people use) give people access to a much greater library of music for them to enjoy.

Legalised music download services, such as the iTunes Music Store, have made this a lot easier, by allowing people to preview tracks and download single songs or whole albums easily. However, services like this are not available in most countries, and the sound quality may leave something to be desired. I buy lots of CDs, rather than download the tracks off the net, because I want to support the artists (even though very little money actually goes to them, according to some sources), and also because the quality of CDs is much better than MP3, AAC, WMA, Ogg, etc… I also have a conscience, and something in me just says that its bad to download the songs and not pay for them. Some people may differ in this respect.

Enough ranting from me. I just think it's silly that the ARIA is hiding the fact that it had record CD sales last year. Instead, it should be embracing these new technologies and working on a download service in Australia, by expediting negotiations with Apple or another vendor.

“Nanograss”

Article at the New York Times

Resume-Writing Tips

Just came across some interesting posts from recruiters at Microsoft (evil! evil!):

The Real First Impression
The Real First Impression - Part II

Courtesy of Robert Scoble.

The Cat Empire - Photos

I posted the photos for the concert last night… I haven't looked through them in any great detail, but from what I saw, some were quite blurry, but others were OK. Blame it on the slow shutter speed of the camera, not me. :)

Photos

The Cat Empire

I just got back from a concert at the Metro Theatre for The Cat Empire… It was unbelievable! It has to be THE BEST concert I've been to… ever. I thought they were good by listening to the CD, but they went beyond my wildest expectations! They're just so much better live, and so energetic. I didn't get much sleep last night, but I found myself jumping around and dancing the hardest I've ever done! They played a lot of the songs from their CD, including "Manifesto", "Beannie", "One Four Five", "Lost Song", "The Rhythm" (which was incredible), "The Wine Song", "Hello" and "Nothing" and "The Chariot" as the encore. I managed to snap 150 photos on the camera, and they're being copied over as I, er… type. I'll put them up into the photo album when they're done.

There's supposed to be a secret concert tomorrow night, but they wouldn't say where it was, as only 200 people are allowed in. I'll have to look for it at work tomorrow.

To anyone out there: If you get a chance to see The Cat Empire live, make sure you don't pass it up!

[Edit: Did I mention I was in the front row of the concert? Right in the centre, too!!!]

Paul’s at it again…

Paul Thurrott has posted another entry to his website lauding the graphics subsystem of Longhorn, 'Avalon', and bashing 'Quartz', the current graphics subsystem on Mac OS X. He says "O'Reilly's Ian Griffiths discusses the Avalon rendering engine in Longhorn in detail, proving as I've been saying for months that Longhorn's graphics subsystem is infinitely more powerful than anything available in Mac OS X." Thurrott fails to realise that Longhorn, nor Avalon, have been released as a shipping product yet, while MacOS X and Quartz have been shipping for close to three years now.

The author of the article clarifies some concerns in the comments where he says "I can't offer a comparison between Avalon and the Mac equivalent (i.e., whatever the Mac graphics technology will be in 2006) because as far as I know, Apple haven't announced what it will be." and "If Apple were telling us what their plans for the next generation of their graphics architecture was, then it would obviously be a different story - then there would be something useful to make comparisons with. If this information had been available to me, I would have included it in the article. But as far as I am aware, Apple haven't released any such information." I can certainly see where the author is coming from here, as Avalon is a technology that will (potentially) be shipping in 2 years, while Quartz was shipping three years ago. Of course it's going to be better and more advanced than it! Paul Thurrott seems to have conveniently brushed over this small, insignificant fact. Now, we don't know what Apple will have by the time 2006 comes around. They may want to leave Quartz as it is, or extend it a bit more, or come up with a brand-spanking new graphics subsystem, I have no idea. However, claiming that Avalon trumps a technology widely available and shipping today is a bit rich…

Blah, blah blah…

Pnau at Manning Bar

I was lucky enough to see Pnau last night at Manning Bar at Sydney Uni. It was great! I've never seen Pnau live before, and while some of the songs wre so-so, "Sambanova", "We Love The Fresh Kills" and "Follow Me" went off!

The guys from Pnau looked like they were off their nuts, though… Oh well, can't hold it against them!

American Goodies

I came across a site that was posted on iPodLounge.com which offers to purchase and ship goods from the US to anywhere around the world, called American Goodies. It looks really, really good! They charge a 'shopping assistance' fee and some other fees for handling the products, but there's the potential to save a lot of money. The Kodak Digital Camera I want costs anywhere between A$550 and A$800 here, but I've seen it for US$248, which is A$326.40 with the current exchange rate, I could save a couple of hundred by doing this…

Now all I need to do is get everything off my credit card, and get some more money! … Grumble grumble.

Lost In Translation

Saw this movie last night, with Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson. I really liked it! It was funny and kinda quirky, and while it didn't seem to have any particular point at the end of the film, it had a couple of important messages. I don't think I've seen Scarlett Johansson in a movie before, but she seems familiar for some reason… Oh, and those lips…




Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Australia
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Australia