Archive for the 'News' Category

How far does free speech go?

I came across a BBC article today on a row over the printing of a few caricatures in a Danish newspaper, one of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad with a headdress shaped like a bomb. Although this occurred last September, it seems to have caused a bit of outrage. I see two reasons for this:

  1. Representations of Muhammad are banned by the Islamic faith (to prevent idolatry)
  2. The caricatures (or at least one of them) portray one of the key figures in the Islamic faith as a terrorist

That's pretty harsh, if you ask me. The caricatures were re-published in other newspapers across Europe, and many Arab countries and groups have expressed their outrage. I say "rightfully so". The chief editor in charge of the France Soir paper (which re-published the caricatures) was recently fired in response to the publishing of the caricatures, and people now have their knickers in a knot because they feel it goes against the ideals of democracy, free speech and freedom of the press! Fair enough, but what about respecting other people and their beliefs?

If Jesus or the Virgin Mary were published in such a way (let's say with a bomb strapped to the chest) in an Arabic newspaper, the Western world would be up in arms about it! Swap the perspective on that and we might understand why so many Islamic people are furious. Free speech and democracy are fine, but that doesn't mean it's acceptable to go around disrespecting people and their faith.

Funnily enough, there's a Wikipedia article on this.

(via Fraser)

UPDATE:

Ehsan Masood wrote that:

As a writer, do I have the right in law to caricature other people if the net result is merely to cause offence? Absolutely. But will I exercise that right knowing that these "other people" are also likely to be my friends and neighbours, my parents' neighbours, my children's friends, people I have known for decades? The answer is self-evident. No.

I think that pretty much sums it up…

Cheap and nasty

The Sydney Morning Herald has an article on Anna Nicole Smith's "antics" at the MTV Awards last night, where she decided to drop her top while presenting an award. Has this woman no modesty, no shame?

News.com.au: Judge slaps Bush down over detainees

News.com.au: "A US federal judge has ruled that military tribunals for international terror suspects at the Guantanamo Bay Naval base are unconstitutional, leaving in doubt the fate of hundreds of detainees." About friggin' time…

SMH: Australian official saw torture, Habib alleges

The Sydney Morning Herald has an article with some details about how an alleged Australian "terrorist", Mamdouh Habib, was tortured, namley in Egypt. I don't think anyone should be treated in such a way, especially when he had not been proven guilty. The people who engage in these acts should be thrown in jail and left to rot - but that won't happen. *sigh*

SMH: Australian Police Given Power To Use ‘Spyware’

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, as a result of the Surveillance Devices Act, federal and state police now have the ability to install "surveillance technologies" (including common spyware apps like keystroke loggers). Lovely. There goes a whole lot of civil rights down the drain.
Continue reading 'SMH: Australian Police Given Power To Use 'Spyware''

SMH: Hicks details Guantanamo ‘abuse’

Sydney Morning Herald: "Hicks details Guantanamo 'abuse'" - That's disgusting. No one has the right to treat any other human being like that, "suspected" terrorist, or not.

SMH: Countries that refuse US immunity ‘face aid cuts’

Sydney Morning Herald: "Countries that refuse US immunity 'face aid cuts'" - Gee, if that isn't bullying and blackmail, I don't know what is. Here's a court that has been set up to deal with war crimes, and because the US administration doesn't agree with it (most likely because some of the administration could be held liable for war crimes *cough* Guantanamo Bay *cough*), it blackmails a whole lot of other countries so they cannot be a part of the ICC, either. Shame.

SMH: The onus on a victim to justify her dress

Sydney Morning Herald: "The onus on a victim to justify her dress"

SMH: Stem cells help paralysed woman walk

The SMH has an article on how stem cells used to repair a Korean woman's spine and allow her to walk (albeit with a frame) again.

Slashdot also has a discussion on it.

Note that this was done using stem cells from cord blood and not embryos, avoiding the whole ethical kerfuffle surrounding the use of embryos. However, as I understand it, stem cells from cord blood cannot be used in as many ways as stem cells from embryos. I'm not quite sure where I stand on this whole issue. I have seen opinions from both "sides", and there are flaws in each. However, the benefit that could come from the use of stem cells is tremendous, so I don't know if it is that easy to just reject the use of stem cells from embryos.

New York Times: When a Video Game Stops Being Fun

New York Times: "When a Video Game Stops Being Fun"




Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Australia
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Australia